Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
United States of America v. Thomas
as 24-726
Defendant: NEGUS THOMAS, JERKENO WALLACE, LAVAR JACKSON and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 24-196
Defendant: NEGUS THOMAS, LAVAR JACKSON, KAVOHN TAYLOR and others
Defendant / Appellant: JERKENO WALLACE and Uptown
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Thomas
as 17-1190
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant: Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E. and Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 17-1196
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant: Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown
United States of America v. Thomas (Thomas)
as 14-1980
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant: Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E.
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 14-1728
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant: Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown and Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E.
Yohalem v. Brunswick Hall
as 13-2531
Plaintiff - Appellant: Rebecca Gloria Yohalem, DBA R.G. Becca Artist
Defendant - Appellee: Brunswick Hall, Jalees Ahmed, Director, Hamptons Center Administration and others
Yohalem v. Brunswick Hall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03706
Defendant: Jalees Ahmed, Brunswick Hall, Hamptons Center Administration and others
Plaintiff: Rebecca Gloria Yohalem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?