Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wilson v. ABM Building Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv04245
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilson
Defendant:
ABM Building Solutions, LLC and ABM Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Charles Davis et al v. ABM Industries Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05623
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis, Jonathan Nabago, Mohamed Bholat and others
Defendant:
ABM Industries, Inc., United Service Workers West SEIU Local 1877 and Does I through X inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Charles Davis et al v. ABM Industries Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis, Jonathan Nabago, Mohamed Bholat and others
Petitioner:
ABM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
United Service Workers West SEIU Local 1877 and Does I through X inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Castro et al v. ABM Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03026
Plaintiff:
Marley Castro and Lucia Marmolejo
Defendant:
ABM Industries, Inc. , ABM Onsite Services - West, Inc. , ABM Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maria Hernandez v. ABM Industries, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00321
Defendant:
ABM Industries, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Maria Hernandez
Castro et al v. ABM Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01947
Plaintiff:
Marley Castro and Lucia Marmolejo
Defendant:
ABM Industries, Inc. , ABM Onsite Services-West, Inc. , ABM Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chen v. Ampco System Parking et al
as 3:2008cv00422
Plaintiff:
William Chen
Defendant:
Ampco System Parking, ABM Industries, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jess Batiz v. American Commercial Security Services (ACSS) et al
as 5:2006cv00566
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hand, Jess Batiz, Gary G Albright and others
Defendant:
American Commercial Security Services (ACSS), ABM Security Services, Security Services of America and others
Petitioner:
Jennifer Augustus
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
