Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MALATESTA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2004-HE9, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-HE9
as 2:2018cv00922
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MALATESTA, SR.
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2004-HE9, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-HE9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAGGART v. MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2007-HE2 et al
as 5:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. TAGGART
Defendant:
MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2007-HE2 , DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY , MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAGGART v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv04455
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J TAGGART
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2007-HE2, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. SANTILLI et al
as 2:2007cv04506
Plaintiff:
GEORGE L. MILLER and GEORGE L. MILLER
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. SANTILLI, BEVERLY SANTILLI, ALBERT W. MANDIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-HE6 v. Lebron et al
as 1:2007cv01146
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-HE6
Defendant:
Kim Scott Lebron and Stephen Lebron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
SIRAVO et al v. COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOAN et al
as 2:2007cv01112
Plaintiff:
N. V. SIRAVO and F. A. SIRAVO
Defendant:
COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOAN, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY and MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
