Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 137
City of Costa Mesa et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02320
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: City of Costa Mesa, The People of the State of California
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching, The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
City of San Clemente et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02326
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through San Clemente City Attorney Scott C. Smith, City of San Clemente
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
City of El Monte et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03588
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through El Monte City Attorney Rick Olivarez, City of El Monte, The People of The State of California
Petitioner: ALLERGAN FINANCE, LLC, F/K/A/ ACTAVIS, INC., F/K/A WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
City of Westminster et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02325
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Westminster City Attorney Richard D. Jones, City of Westminster
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
County of Kern et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00557
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: County of Kern, The People of the State of California, People of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
County of Alameda, California v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler et al
as 3:2019cv02317
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, JONATHAN D. SACKLER, an individual and as trustee for TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF MEMBERS OF THE RAYMOND SACKLER FAMILY and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler, County of Alameda, California
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
City of Santa Ana et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv02324
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Santa Ana City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho, CITY OF SANTA ANA
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
County of Alameda, California et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02307
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: County of Alameda, California, The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
The City of San Diego et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00420
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: The City of San Diego, The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?