Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Marlin v. B & L Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04448
Plaintiff:
James B. Marlin
Defendant:
B & L Transport, Inc. , Acuity A Mutual Insurance Company and Tommy Nickelson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thrasher v. Acuity Brands, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03410
Plaintiff:
Racquel Thrasher
Defendant:
Acuity Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. v. Bickley et al
as 1:2014mi00032
Plaintiff:
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
Defendant:
Shane Bickley and Michael Robinson
Movant:
Delta T Corporation and Jay Dantzler
Zep Inc. et al v. Murachanian
as 1:2013cv03685
Plaintiff:
Zep Inc. and Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.
Defendant:
John Murachanian
Counter_claimant:
John Murachanian
Counter_defendant:
Acuity Specialty Products, Inc. and Zep Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zep Inc. et al v. Wittenstein
as 1:2012cv03008
Plaintiff:
Zep Inc. and Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.
Defendant:
David A. Wittenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elliott et al v. Hattaway et al
as 1:2012cv01861
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Elliott and Lottie Anderson
Defendant:
Jay Hattaway , Floyd Trucking, LLC and Acuity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Coppola et al v. Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03124
Plaintiff:
Carl Coppola , Marlene Coppola , Carl Coppola 2006 Two-Year Annuity Trust and others
Defendant:
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. v. Coppola et al
as 1:2010cv02795
Plaintiff:
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
Defendant:
Carl Coppola, Carl Coppola 2006 Two-Year Annuity Trust and Lighthouse Pointe Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
