Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp v. Secretary United States Department of Health, et al
as 24-2968
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP
Novo Nordisk Inc, et al v. Secretary US Dept & Health and Human Services, et al
as 24-2510
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
NOVO NORDISK INC and NOVO NORDISK PHARMA INC
Bristol Myers Squibb Co v. Secretary United States Department of HHS, et al
as 24-1820
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO
Defendant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc v. Secretary United States Department of HHS, et al
as 24-1821
Plaintiff:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Defendant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al v. Secretary United States Department of Health and H, et al
as 24-1819
Plaintiff:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA AB
Defendant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
Temple University Hospital v. Secretary United States Dept, et al
as 21-1293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and CHAIRMAN MEDICARE GEOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION REVIEW BOARD
Mallinckrodt ARD LLC v. Seema Verma, et al
as 20-5154
Defendant / Appellee:
Seema Verma, in her official capacity as Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mallinckrodt ARD LLC, formerly known as Mallinckrodt Ard Inc.
Samuel Philbrick, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-5295
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ian Ludders, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Karin Vlk, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Samuel Philbrick, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Samuel Philbrick, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-5293
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ian Ludders, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Karin Vlk, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Samuel Philbrick, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Kaumana Drive Partners, LLC v. USHHS, et al
as 19-71886
Respondent:
CATHERINE KORTZEBORN, Deputy Regional Administrator, Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services, SEEMA VERMA, Administrator, Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services, GREGORY DILL, Consortium Administrator, Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Petitioner:
KAUMANA DRIVE PARTNERS, LLC, DBA Legacy Hilo Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
