Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Myles v. Jutte et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Japhon Myles
Defendant:
Kolton Jutte and ADT Transport LLC
Other:
Mark Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
BROOKSHIRE MANAGEMENT, INC., doing business as TRAVEL LEADERS INDIANAPOLIS v. ADT LLC/DEFENDERS, INC.
as 1:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
BROOKSHIRE MANAGEMENT INC., doing business as TRAVEL LEADERS INDIANAPOLIS
Defendant:
ADT LLC/DEFENDERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
McCloud v. ADT LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Leslie McCloud
Defendant:
ADT LLC and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Youn et al v. ADT LLC
as 2:2019cv00402
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Plaintiff:
Sok Won Youn and Kong Chu youn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3
Thompson v The ADT Corporation
as 2:2018cv00452
Defendant:
The ADT Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tammy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Mulhern v. ADT Security Services, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00229
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Mulhern
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, LLC , Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. and Prime Security Services Topco Parent, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez et al v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Maria Gonzalez and Salma Gonzalez
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc , ADT LLC , Eric Hardisty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES
as 1:2015cv00877
Defendant:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EDWARD COOPER
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
