Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HICKS et al v. DEFENDERS SECURITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv06058
Plaintiff:
NORMAN HICKS and LINDA SCAVELLO
Defendant:
DEFENDERS SECURITY COMPANY , ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. , ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS NORTHEAST, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
STILLMAN v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03079
Plaintiff:
HOLLY SUE STILLMAN
Defendant:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. , ADT SECURITY SERVICES , ADT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DUNCAN et al v. BLUE LIGHT SECURITY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv04350
Plaintiff:
MARK DUNCAN and MICHELLE DUNCAN
Defendant:
BLUE LIGHT SECURITY, INC. and ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.,
as 2:2012cv02330
Plaintiff:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADT SERVICES A.G. et al v. CENCOM, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00740
Plaintiff:
ADT SERVICES A.G. and ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CENCOM, INC. and RONALD H. CATS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BURGESS et al v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv02205
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURGESS and BREON BURGESS
Defendant:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
