Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Wilhelm v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
AeroJet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Carlisle v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01956
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
David DeRosa v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
David DeRosa
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Vesely v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vesely
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Eileen P. Drake, Gail Baker and others
Robert Gaither v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01074
Plaintiff:
Robert Gaither
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. LOCKHEED MARTIN et al
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN and AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
City of Wabash, Indiana v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
CITY OF WABASH, INDIANA and Wabash, Indiana City of
Defendant:
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Clark v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01749
Defendant:
Eileen P. Drake, Audrey A. McNiff, James R. Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Clark
HARNEY v. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00913
Defendant:
AUDREY A MCNIFF, AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC., LANCE W LORD and others
Plaintiff:
RACHEL HARNEY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Carlisle v. AeroJet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00281
Defendant:
James R. Henderson, Audrey A. McNiff, Eileen P. Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
