Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC v. Kellanova
as 1:2024cv00489
Defendant: Kellanova and Kellogg Company
Plaintiff: Local No. 70 Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Viking Corporation, The v. Local Union 5965 United Steel Workers AFL-CIO-CLC
as 1:2020cv01214
Plaintiff: Viking Corporation, The
Defendant: Local Union 5965 United Steel Workers AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Kellogg Company v. Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Union, Local 3-G et al
as 1:2019cv00707
Plaintiff: Kellogg Company
Defendant: Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers, Local 3-G, Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers, International Union AFL-CIO, CLC, Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers, International Union AFL-CIO, CLC v. Kellogg Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01180
Defendant: Kellogg Company
Plaintiff: Local Union No. 3-G, Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers And Grain Millers and Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers, International Union AFL-CIO, CLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Pinnacle Foods Corporation v. United Dairy and Bakery Wokers Local No. 87 of the RWDSU Council of UFCW-AFL-CIO-CLC
as 2:2015cv12412
Plaintiff: Pinnacle Foods Corporation
Defendant: United Dairy and Bakery Wokers Local No. 87 of the RWDSU Council of UFCW-AFL-CIO-CLC
United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Kelsey-Hayes Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv15497
Defendant: Kelsey-Hayes Company , TRW Automotive Inc. and TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation
Plaintiff: United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC , Ronald D. Strait and Danny O. Stevens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW) et al v. TRW Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv14434
Plaintiff: RICHARD GARDEN, MARSHALL HUNT, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WOR and others
Defendant: Kelsey-Hayes Company, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. and others
Consolidated Defendant: TRW Automotive Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Ronald D. Strait and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Autry v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv12462
Plaintiff: James Autry
Defendant: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC , USW Local 1299 , James Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Dow Chemical Company
as 1:2010cv11450
Plaintiff: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant: Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Sims et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv10743
Plaintiff: Keary C. Sims, Sr., Clark Bailey and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company, L L C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?