Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 102
The Estate of William Scales v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1181-1061, AFL-CIO
as 24-877
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCALES
Defendant: AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 1181-1061, AFL-CIO
Broecker v. New York City Department of Education
as 23-655
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nicole Broecker, Michelle Martino, Gina Porcello and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York City Department of Education, Meisha Porter, United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO and others
Garland v. New York City Fire Department
as 23-663
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Garland, Vincent Bottalico, Timothy A. Heaton and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York City Fire Department, Daniel A. Nigro, John Doe #1-10 and others
Defendant: Uniformed Fire Officers Association, Local 854 International Association of Firefighters, Affiliated with the AFL-CIO and Uniformed Firefighters Association of Greater New York
Local 3621, EMS Officers Union, DC-37, AFSCME, AFL v. City of New York
as 22-3099
Petitioner: Local 3621, EMS Officers Union, DC-37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, individually and on behalf of its members, Renae Mascol, on behalf of herself and all other similarly-situated individuals and Luis Rodriguez, on behalf of himself and all other similarly-situated individuals
Respondent: City of New York, New York City Fire Department, Department of Citywide Administrative Services and others
RHC Operating LLC v. New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council, AFL-CIO
as 22-1393
Petitioner / Appellant: RHC Operating LLC
Respondent / Appellee: New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council, AFL-CIO
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-437
Petitioner: Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL - CIO, John Dellio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent: Thomas J. Madison, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millan, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation, Howard P. Milstein, Individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of New York State Thruway/Canal Corporation Board of Directors and others
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-435
Petitioner: Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, William Coleman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent: Thomas J. Madison, Jr., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millian, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation;, Brian U. Stratton, in his official capacity as Director of the New York State Canal Corporation and others
International Brotherhood of E v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 21-2984
Petitioner: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union No.3
Respondent: Charter Communications, Inc., Successor to Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC
Bennett v. County of Rockland
as 21-2597
Plaintiff: Heather Bennett, William Bennett, Ann Cole-Hatchard and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Laureen Connelly, Donna Delarm, Jill Donovan and others
Defendant / Appellant: County of Rockland and Kathleen Tower-Bernstein, in her individual capacity
Local Union 97, International v. NRG Energy, Inc.
as 21-2565
Plaintiff / Appellant: Local Union 97, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO
Defendant / Appellee: NRG Energy, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?