Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rutherford v. Arizona Public Service Company et al
as 2:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
David S Rutherford
Defendant:
Arizona Public Service Company, Local 387 Electrical Workers Building Association Union, APS Apprenticeship Program and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United Food & Commercial Workers et al v. Ducey et al
as 2:2021cv01015
Plaintiff:
Arizona State AFL-CIO, James McLaughlin and Local 99 United Food & Commercial Workers
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Douglas Ducey, Dale L Schultz and others
Petitioner:
Local 469 United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Arizona Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Fund, Arizona Pipe Trades Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United Medical Services Workers, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO v. River Medical Incorporated
as 3:2020cv08330
Defendant:
River Medical Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Local 2960 United Medical Services Workers, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Van Kirk et al v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO et al
as 2:2020cv01961
Plaintiff:
Michael Van Kirk, Gary Bailey and Michael Kersztyn
Defendant:
Local 469 United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO and Aaron Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Asarco LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al
as 2:2019cv04393
Defendant:
Local 2181 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, Local Union No. 741 United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Trade and others
Plaintiff:
ASARCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
ASARCO LLC v. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC, et., al.
as 2:2018cv03534
Defendant:
Local 2181 International Assocation of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local 518 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Unions 886-02, 915 and 5252 United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC and others
Plaintiff:
ASARCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Contreras et al v. ASARCO LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03495
Defendant:
ASARCO LLC, ASARCO LLC Union Employee Benefits Plan and ASARCO Retiree Medical Plan
Plaintiff:
Arnold Contreras, Celestino W Flores, Charles M Estrada and others
Cross Defendant:
Local 1914 Millwright, Local 627 Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmith, Forger and Helpers, Locals 518,570 and 602 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and others
Counter Defendant:
Local 518 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
ASARCO LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
as 2:2015cv00117
Petitioner:
ASARCO LLC
Respondent:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS CWA, AFL-CIO v. MESA AIR GROUP, INC., d/b/a Mesa Airlines, Inc., Freedom Air., Inc., and GO Airlines, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01223
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS CWA, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
MESA AIR GROUP, INC., d/b/a Mesa Airlines, Inc., Freedom Air., Inc., and GO Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Gilding v. Carr et al
as 2:2008cv02137
Plaintiff:
John Gilding
Defendant:
John S Carr, Jerry Johnston, Ellen Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
