Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Dorsett v. Liquor Emporium, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21919
Plaintiff:
Alethia Dorsett
Defendant:
Liquor Emporium, Inc. and James Bien Aime
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kim v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv01564
Plaintiff:
Hyeyun Kim
Defendant:
David Riddle, AIM Leasing Company, American Zurich Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bien-Aime v. Wellpath Health Services et al
as 9:2023cv81470
Plaintiff:
Amos Bien-Aime
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services, Dr. Charles Dack and Dr. Cardelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
AIM Immunotech, Inc v. Franz Tudor, et al
as 23-13576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AIM IMMUNOTECH, INC
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANZ TUDOR, TODD DEUTSCH, TED KELLNER and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Securities and Exchange Commission v. MFB 111 Investment, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv23583
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
MFB 111 Investment, LLC, Monise Francois Bien Aime and Julien Janvier
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
AIMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12815
Plaintiff:
TIM AIMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AIMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08020
Plaintiff:
TIM AIMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AIMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08017
Plaintiff:
TIM AIMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
