Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ned Spragling, II v. Akron Public Schools, et al
as 19-3277
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT JEFF FERGUSON, Tallmadge City Schools, In his official and individual capacities, LAURA LYNN CROSS, COACH RICKY POWERS, Akron Public Schools, In his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NED SPRAGLING, II
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, # 1-5, Administrators and Principals of Akron Public Schools, In their official and individual capacities, # 6-10 Administrators and principals of Tallmadge City Schools, In their official and individual capacities
Spragling, II v. Akron Public Schools et al
as 5:2018cv01969
Defendant:
Superintendent Jeff Ferguson, Akron Public Schools, Tallmadge City Schools and others
Plaintiff:
Ned Spragling, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Likely, IV. v. Van Norstran et al
as 5:2017cv02227
Plaintiff:
Earl M Likely, IV.
Defendant:
Jerry Van Norstran , Bill Emery, Ginelle Rasnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
