Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DE LA CRUZ-RAMOS, et al v. ADC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO DE LA CRUZ-RAMOS, NORA DE LA CRUZ and SANTIAGO CASTRO-CORDOVA
Defendant:
ADC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC, GNA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC and ALEJANDRO DE LA CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DE LA CRUZ-RAMOS v. ADC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO DE LA CRUZ RAMOS, NORA DE LA CRUZ and SANTIAGO CASTRO-CORDOVA
Defendant:
ADC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC, GNA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC and ALEJANDRO DE LA CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Benitez Gonzalez et al v. O. J. Smith Farms, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00087
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Bautista Cruz, Alejandro De La Cruz Medina, Jose Esteban Hernandez Cruz and others
Defendant:
Jean J. Boseman, Sandra W. McDaniel, Joel M. Boseman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Benitez Gonzalez et al v. O. J. Smith Farms, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00086
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Bautista Cruz, Alejandro De La Cruz Medina, Jose Esteban Hernandez Cruz and others
Defendant:
Sandra W. McDaniel, Joel M. Boseman, Jean J Boseman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Isela Mendoza Munoz, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71755
Petitioner:
ISELA VIRIDIANA MENDOZA MUNOZ, AKA Isela Viridiana De La Cruz, URIEL DE LA CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, AKA Manuel Estrada-Garcia, URIEL ALEJANDRO DE LA CRUZ MENDOZA and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Jorges et al v. Nightline Building Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00545
Plaintiff:
Francisco Jorges , Jadiel Hernandez , Alejandro de la Cruz and others
Defendant:
Nightline Building Maintenance, Inc., Gordon Bartle and Reina Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01428
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
