Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Havlish v. Bin-Laden
as 23-258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fiona Havlish, Russa Steiner, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of William Steiner, deceased, Clara Chirchirillo, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of Peter Chirchirillo and others
Defendant:
Sheikh Usama Bin-Laden, The Taliban, Muhammad Omar and others
Appellee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Defendant / Appellee:
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden, AKA Osama Bin-Laden and Al Qaida/Islamic Army
Ryan et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW VAN AUKEN, PATRICIA D. CASAZZA, LORIE VAN AUKEN and others
Defendant:
National Iranian Gas Company, Iran Airlines, National Iranian Oil Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ray et al v . Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Ali Hoseini-Khamenei, Iran Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics, Iran Airlines and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Medaglia-Dellapenna, Harley DiNardo, Mary Ellen Murach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Jenny Rubin, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 14-7198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jenny Rubin, Deborah Rubin, Daniel Miller and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran and others
Garnishee - Appellee:
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
SHOHAM v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2012cv00508
Plaintiff:
BATSHEVA SHOHAM
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
HOGLAN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2011cv07550
Defendant:
Ansar bank, Mehr bank, Bonyad Taavon Sepah and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Bradish, Alice Hoglan, Loretta Haines and others
Cause Of Action: M 22-1 Designation by U.S. Attorney of individual to accept service of summons and complaint
HOGLAN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2011cv01634
Plaintiff:
ALICE HOGLAN , KELLY ARTHURS , KAREN BINGHAM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ALI AKBAR HASHEMI RAFSANJANI, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
Diana Campuzano, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 08-7085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Diana Campuzano, Avi Elishis and Greg Salzman
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Hamas and others
Alann Steen v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 08-5173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alann B. Steen and Virginia Steen
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
The Field Museum, The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, The Oriental Institute and others
Donna Holland v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 08-7063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donna Marie Holland, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert S. Holland, deceased, Charles Holland, Rosemary Holland and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, also known as The Pasdaran and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
The Field Museum, The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, The Oriental Institute and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
