Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
In re: Mark Stinson
as 26-11750
Petitioner: In re: MARK T. STINSON
Respondent: KEVIN G. RITZ, WILLIAM BATEMAN, III, MARY H. MORRIS and others
In re: Mark Stinson
as 26-10161
Petitioner: In re: MARK T. STINSON
Respondent: KEVIN G. RITZ, WILLIAM BATEMAN, III, MARY H. MORRIS and others
In re: Mark Stinson
as 26-10089
Petitioner: In re: MARK T. STINSON
Respondent: KEVIN G. RITZ, WILLIAM BATEMAN, III, MARY H. MORRIS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr.In re: Mark Stinson, Sr.
as 25-13040
Petitioner: In re: MARK T. STINSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KEVIN G. RITZ, WILLIAM BATEMAN, III and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Kevin Ritz, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 25-11145
Plaintiff: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant: KEVIN G. RITZ, WILLIAM BATEMAN, III, MARY H. MORRIS and others
In re: Mark Stinson, Sr.
as 25-10190
Petitioner: In re: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Respondent: KEVIN G. RITZ, WILLIAM BATEMAN, III, MARY H. MORRIS and others
Stinson Sr. v. Ritz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv24451
Defendant: Kayla Jones, Edwin G. Torres, John T. Fowlkes, Jr. and others
Plaintiff: Mark T. Stinson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 24-1901
Defendant: HONORABLE DAMON J. KEITH, (deceased), HONORABLE GILBERT S. MERRITT, (deceased), HONORABLE KARL S. FORESTER and others
Plaintiff: ANTONIO HUDSON
Antonio Hudson v. Denise Page Hood, et al
as 24-1904
Defendant: MICHAEL C. EAGEN, Michigan Parole Board, CLAYTON HIGGINS, JR., Case Manager, United States Supreme Court, DENISE PAGE HOOD, former Chief Judge, United States District Court and others
Plaintiff: ANTONIO HUDSON
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee: HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?