Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Woods v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2015cv01649
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Paroles et al, William Stephens and Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Stephens et al
as 4:2014cv03657
Petitioner:
Allen Richardson Woods
Respondent:
William Stephens and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Bill Hall, Jr. Trucking, LTD. et al
as 5:2014cv00459
Plaintiff:
Jose Arreguin, Darren Burke, Douglas Mackey and others
Defendant:
Bill Hall, Jr. Trucking, LTD., Dominique Hall and Iron Horse Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Woods v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv03409
Petitioner:
Allen Richardson Woods
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Stephens
as 3:2013cv00401
Petitioner:
Allen Richardson Woods
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Secretary Of State et al
as 4:2013cv02469
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
Secretary Of State, Governor of Texas and Board of Pardons And Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Police Chief Lattimore et al
as 4:2012cv02710
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
Police Chief Lattimore, Police Officer Preston Cloyd, Judge George Cason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv02667
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Preston Cloyd, George Cason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Dewberry et al
as 6:2011cv00462
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
Unknown Dewberry, Director, TDCJ-CID, Greg Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Dewberry et al
as 6:2011cv00463
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
Unknown Dewberry, Director, TDCJ-CID, Greg Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
