Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Theron Vinson v. Covil Corporation
as 21-1297
Defendant:
COVIL CORPORATION, ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERON T. VINSON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Kerry D. Vinson and LINDA G. VINSON
William Brock v. Covil Corporation
as 21-1298
Defendant:
GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., f/k/a Aqua-Chem, Inc., d/b/a Cleaver-Brooks Division, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE Y. BROCK and WILLIAM L. BROCK
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., successor-by-merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a/k/a BF Sturtevant, a Delaware Corporation and COVIL CORPORATION
Intervenor Defendant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
James E. Joyner v. Crane Co.
as 13-1868
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES E. JOYNER
Defendant - Appellant:
CRANE CO, individually and as successor to National-U.S. Radiator, is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Connecticut
Defendant:
AC&R INSULATION CO., INC., ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, INC., ALLIS-CHALMERS ENERGY, INC. and others
James Joyner v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
as 13-1866
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES E. JOYNER
Defendant - Appellant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
AC&R INSULATION CO., INC., ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, INC., ALLIS-CHALMERS ENERGY, INC. and others
Joyner v. A.C. & R Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02294
Plaintiff:
James E. Joyner
Defendant:
Allen-Bradley Company, Inc., Allis-Chalmers Energy, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
John Crane, Inc. , A.C. & R Insulation Co., Inc., A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
