Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Alvarenga v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2022cv04248
Plaintiff:
Milton Alvarenga
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Alvarenga v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02803
Plaintiff:
Tania Leonor Alvarenga
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvarenga v. Neagu et al
as 1:2019cv00568
Defendant:
Wizzard Way, Inc. and Daniel Neagu
Plaintiff:
Karitza Alvarenga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alvarenga v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00180
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tania Leonor Alvarenga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarenga v. Target Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv01481
Plaintiff:
Maria Alvarenga
Defendant:
Target Corporation , Memorial City Mall GP, LLC , Memorial City Mall, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarenga-Sarmiento v. Director TDCJ-CID ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO THE LUFKIN DIVISION.
as 1:2018cv00063
Petitioner:
Ledys Geovanny Alvarenga-Sarmiento
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alvarenga-Sarmiento v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 9:2018cv00037
Petitioner:
Ledys Geovanny Alvarenga-Sarmiento
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cedillos-Alvarenga v. United States District Court
as 7:2017mc01465
Petitioner:
Maria Felix Cedillos-Alvarenga
Respondent:
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
