Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. FUSIMO
as 1:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Respondent:
J. FUSIMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alvin Smith v. USA, et al
as 21-55253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, AHSA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and its agents, METHER, Dr., USHS and others
SMITH v. WHITE
as 1:2020cv00942
Plaintiff:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Defendant:
Unit Manager White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2020cv01015
Defendant:
AHSA Unknown, Felipe Martinez, Jr., United States and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WHITE
as 1:2018cv01605
Plaintiff:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Defendant:
WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2015cv01672
Plaintiff:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, USPC Chairman/Examiners, U.S. BOP's Director/Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. U.S.P.C -/EMPLOYEES et al
as 3:2014cv00597
Petitioner:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Defendant:
U.S.P.C -/EMPLOYEES , F.B.O.P.'S /EMPLOYEES , DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mr. Alvin-Darrell Smith (RC) v. F.B.O.P.'S Charles E. Samuels Jr. et al
as 2:2014cv01713
Defendant:
(USP) Victorville Staff, C/O Arualla, C/O Arualla and others
RC:
Mr. Alvin-Darrell Smith
SMITH v. U.S.P.C -/EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2014cv01093
Petitioner:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Defendant:
U.S.P.C -/EMPLOYEES, F.B.O.P.'S /EMPLOYEES, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
