Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05640
Plaintiff:
Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ANTINGLS, Canyoo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
DALMEIDA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89513
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMAKOE DALMEIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADERHOLDT et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01382
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey, Daniel Bright, Daniel Conley and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aderholdt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00988
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey, Daniel Bright, Daniel Conley and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company v. UPA CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2008at00184
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company
Defendant:
UPA CALIFORNIA, UPA Group, Inc., Amako Resort Construction (U.S.) Inc., a Washington Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company v. UPA California et al
as 2:2008cv00363
Plaintiff:
Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company
Defendant:
UPA California, UPA Group, Inc., Amako Resort Construction (U.S.) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. UPA California et al
as 3:2008cv00611
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
UPA California, UPA Group, Inc., UPCAL Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
