Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Marshall v. Alameda Contra Costa Transit District et al
as 4:2024cv00996
Plaintiff: Danny Marshall
Defendant: Alameda Contra Costa Transit District, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 192 and Robert L. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Amalgamated Transit Union International et al v. United States Department Of Labor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00953
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Transit Union Local 192, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1575, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1277 and others
Defendant: Patrick Pizzella and United States Department of Labor
Intervenor: State Of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv06869
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 276 et al v. San Joaquin Regional Transit District et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01480
Defendant: San Joaquin Regional Transit District, Donna DeMartino and Brad Menil
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Transit Union Local 276 and Alan Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 276 et al v. San Joaquin Regional Transit District et al
as 2:2018at00895
Defendant: San Joaquin Regional Transit District, Donna DeMartino and Brad Menil
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Transit Union Local 276 and Alan Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faison et al v. Friendly Transportation, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02646
Plaintiff: Thina Faison, Ernest Strange, Jr., Edith Johnson and others
Defendant: Friendly Transportation, Inc. , Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 192 and Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03103
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1225 v. MV Transportation, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv04480
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1225
Defendant: MV Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
IN RE STEC, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 8:2009cv01304
Plaintiff: Fred Jean, Keith Johnson, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Jonathan Fischer, Arman Rashtchi, Keith A Ovitt and others
Petitioner: The Firefighters' Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust, Building Trades United Pension Pension Trust Fund and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103 I.B.E.W., STEC, Inc. Investor Group and others
Defendant: Stec Inc, Manouch Moshayedi, Mark Moshayedi and others
Consolidated Defendant: Raymond D Cook, J P Morgan Securities Inc, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc and others
Interested Party: Mark Berry and Jordan Grayson
Intervenor: West Virginia Laborers Trust Fund
The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv02046
Plaintiff: The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union and others
Defendant: L. Stephen Smith, W. Roger Haughton, David H. Katkov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities & Exchange Commission Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?