Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 350
In Re: Request from Germany
as 1:2024cv00493
Petitioner: Amazon.com, Inc.
Respondent: Nokia Technologies Oy, Alcatel Lucent SAS, Nokia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner: Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent: Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Wanjuan Media (Tianjin) Co. LTD v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-899
Plaintiff: WANJUAN MEDIA (TIANJIN) CO. LTD and Pilot Film And Television Media (Tianjin) Co., LTD.
Defendant: AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1633
Appellant: WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1634
Appellant: WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Hogan, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1893
Plaintiff: ANGELA HOGAN, ANDREA SEBERSON and CHRISTOPHER HOPPER
Defendant: AMAZON.COM, INC.
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff: STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant: AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Seidler v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1489
Plaintiff: KATHRYN MARIE SEIDLER
Defendant: AMAZON.COM, INC.
Beagle et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff: Meredith Beagle and Jordan Guerrero
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AlmondNet, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 24-1427
Appellant: ALMONDNET, INC.
Appellee: META PLATFORMS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?