Other Statutes Cases
Zaragosa-Solis v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Defendant / Appellee: M GUTIERREZ, complex warden, Unknown UNKNOWN CHRISTENSEN, PREA Lt., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, federal agency and others
Gabriel Pittman v. President Donald J. Trump, et al
as 20-1961
Defendant / Appellee: PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, C.O. BRADLEY HERRON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GABRIEL PITTMAN
Elvis Jones v. The Virginia ACA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6267
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, THE AMERICAN CORRECTIONS ASSOCIATION, THE VIRGINIA ACA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Elvis Jones v. ACA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6255
Defendant / Appellee: POLUNSKY FACULTY, POLUNSKY AUDITS, THE VIRGINIA CONTROLLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Gabriel Pittman v. American Correctional Associat, et al
as 19-1141
Defendant: PADOC SECRETARY JOHN A. WETZEL, in his Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities, PA SECRETARY OF TREASURY TIMOTHY K. REESE, in his Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities, CORRECTIONAL CABLE TELEVISION CORP INC, in its Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee: SCI-HOUTZDALE MAILROOM SUPERVISOR GAILEY, In his Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, in his Individual, Official and Corporate Capacities, U.S. SECRETARY OF TREASURY STEVEN MNUCHIN, in his Individual, Offical and Corporate Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GABRIEL PITTMAN
In re: Ari Bailey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1956
Petitioner: In re: ARI BAILEY
Respondent: HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAUERS and others
Nominal Respondent: RICHARD P. CONABOY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?