Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Jeremy Langley, et al v. Brendan Kelly
as 23-1827
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEREMY W. LANGLEY, TIMOTHY B. JONES and MATTHEW WILSON
Defendant / Appellant:
BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, et al v. Jay R. Pritzker, et al
as 23-1828
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES OF ILLINOIS, GUNS SAVE LIFE, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAY R. PRITZKER, Governor of the State of Illinois, KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Dane Harrel, et al v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 23-1826
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DANE HARREL, C4 GUN STORE, LLC, MARENGO GUNS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Javier Herrera v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 23-1793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVIER HERRERA, Doctor
Defendant / Appellee:
KWAME RAOUL, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Illinois, BRENDAN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Director of the Illinois State Police, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, a body politic and corporate and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION
Hartford et al v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2023cv05364
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hartford, Douglas Mitchell, Sporting Systems Vancouver, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Robert Ferguson, John R Batiste, John Gese and others
Amicus Curiae:
Washington Gun Rights and American Firearms Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
