Cases 11 - 19 of 19
HID Ballasts - End-Payor Actions
as 2:2013cv01703
Plaintiff:
Ifeoma Adams , Melissa Barron , David Bernstein and others
Defendant:
Panasonic Corporation , Panasonic Corporation of North America , Stanley Electric Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
INTERACTIVE HEALTH V KING KONG USA
as 09-1141
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
American Lighting Industry, Inc., Bernard Koay, King Kong USA, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Blair Hayes
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Daito Dengki Kogyu KK (dba Daito Electric Machine Industry) and Interactive Health LLC (n/k/a Human Touch LLC)
INTERACTIVE HEALTH V KING KONG USA
as 09-1401
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
American Lighting Industry, Inc.
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. et al v. William Castro et al
as 2:2008cv03387
Defendant:
American Light, LLC, Riki Babila, Betray Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. and Bravado International Group, Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
KOITO MANUFACTURING V TURN KEY TECH
as 05-1475
Defendant-Appellant:
JENS OLE SORENSEN and TURN-KEY-TECH, LLC
Plaintiff-Appellee:
KOITO MANUFACTURING CO., LTD. and NORTH AMERICAN LIGHTING, INC.
KOITO MANUFACTURING V TURN KEY TECH
as 03-1565
Defendant-Appellant:
JENS OLE SORENSEN and TURN-KEY-TECH, LLC
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
KOITO MANUFACTURING CO., LTD. and NORTH AMERICAN LIGHTING, INC.
ATLANTIC REP V AMERICAN LIGHTING
as 01-1361
Defendant-Appellant:
AMERICAN LIGHTING INDUSTRY INC., AMERICAN LIGHTING INDUSTRY INC. and AMERICAN LIGHTING INDUSTRY INC.
ATLANTIC REP V AMERICAN LIGHTING
as 01-1326
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
AMERICAN LIGHTING INDUSTRY INC., IEM FURNITURE INC., JOHN YEH and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ATLANTIC REPRESENTATIONS, INC., ATLANTIC REPRESENTATIONS, INC. and ATLANTIC REPRESENTATIONS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
