Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pima, County of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00166
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Pima, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucson, City of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00167
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tucson, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hopkins v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv02646
Defendant:
Actavis Incorporated, Purdue Pharma Incorporated, Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
F Kirk Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
National Roofers Union & Employers Joint Health & Welfare Fund v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv01949
Plaintiff:
National Roofers Union & Employers Joint Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP, Cephalon Incorporated, Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Davis v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01157
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , McKesson Medical-Surgical Incorporated , Guerbet LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Hilary Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phoenix, City of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv01150
Plaintiff:
Phoenix, City of
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP, Cephalon Incorporated, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bratton et al v. Schering-Plough Corporation et al
as 2:2007at10337
Plaintiff:
Beryl A'Dare Bratton and Dorothy Bratton
Defendant:
Schering-Plough Corporation, Schering Corporation, Schering Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Bratton et al v. Schering-Plough Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00653
Plaintiff:
Beryl A'Dare Bratton, Beryl A'Dare Bratton, Dorothy Bratton and others
Defendant:
Schering-Plough Corporation, Schering-Plough Corporation, Schering Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
