Cases 11 - 20 of 30
BROWN v. FALVEY et al
as 3:2022cv05861
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN FALVEY, LT . EIGENRAUNCH, JAMES RUSSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv05482
Plaintiff:
TREYMANE DURHAM and TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, AMY EMRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORMASI v. HICKS et al
as 3:2022cv01745
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. TORMASI
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, JOHN FALVEY, JOHNATHAN GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. ROYCE et al
as 3:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
RAK RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
RAYMOND ROYCE, MARSHAL FLETCHER, MICHAEL CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANBACK v. WISLER et al
as 3:2021cv19847
Plaintiff:
ABDUL M. STANBACK
Defendant:
BARRY A. WISLER, BORG FATHOM, DAVE RICHARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. JOVANOVIC et al
as 3:2021cv16723
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
O.F.C. L. JOVANOVIC, O.F.C. Z. GOODWIN, O.F.C. J. AKTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALLIPURATH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv04567
Defendant:
HAVIS INC., DR. COFFMAN, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M PALLIPURATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IBRAHIM v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2021cv03633
Defendant:
OFC. C. ZETTY, OFFICER LOIZOS, SGT. E. MARICONDA and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
