Cases 41 - 50 of 660
Anderson v. Corrigan
as 1:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Wilfred L. Anderson
Defendant:
Judge Peter J. Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CRUSA Cincinnati, LLC v. O'Hara et al
as 1:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
CRUSA Cincinnati, LLC
Defendant:
Randy M. O'Hara, SERVPRO OF CAMPBELL COUNTY, SERVPRO OF ANDERSON, FRANKLIN & SCOTT COUNTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Anderson v. ABF Freight System, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Roger Anderson
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc. and David Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Anderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Linda Anderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frett Ali v. Byrd et al
as 1:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
Demetrius-Anderson Frett Ali
Defendant:
Nailah K. Byrd, Judge Kathleen A. Sutula and Belind Kyle-Gest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Anderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
Melvin Anderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Magwood v. DeWine et al
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Shane Magwood
Defendant:
Gov Mike DeWine, Warden Kim Anderson, Major Jack Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
