Cases 21 - 30 of 186
WATTS v. HALE et al
as 3:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
REICO WATTS
Defendant:
SHERIFF JAMES A HALE, JR, DEPUTY SHERIFF ANDREW R HENDERSON and STANLEY M SWISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stepherson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv02745
Defendant:
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brannen et al v. City of Jesup, Georgia et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Rachel Brannen, Jason LaRoche, Matthew LaRoche and others
Defendant:
City of Jesup, Georgia, Mike Lane, Ray Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hooks v. Henkle et al
as 1:2022cv01995
Plaintiff:
Lacresa Hooks
Defendant:
Andrew Henkle, Sheriff Eric J. Levett, Investigator Stephen J. Rutledge and others
BOLTON v. TOBY et al
as 5:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
GEROME BOLTON and LILVENDER BOLTON
Defendant:
Warden ANNETTIA TOBY, Deputy Warden GEORGE IVEY, MELONTAE HAVIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Georgia Atlas, Inc. v. Turnage et al
as 1:2021cv03520
Plaintiff:
Georgia Atlas, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew L. Turnage and Christopher Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
