Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SKOWRONSKI v. REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NEW JERSEY, LLC
as 2:2023cv08247
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SKOWRONSKI
Defendant:
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NEW JERSEY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
BALUHA v. MORGAN PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02111
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BALUHA
Defendant:
MORGAN PROPERTIES, LLC, BRENDA ROBINSON and MORGAN PROPERTIES PAYROLL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hess v. Township of Saint Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Hess
Defendant:
Township of Saint Thomas, Saint Thomas Township Municipal Authority, Travis Amsley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Wolfe v. Township of Middlesex et al
as 1:2020cv00459
Defendant:
Township of Middlesex and Barry Sherman
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
v. BUCK et al
as 2:2019cv21123
Defendant:
ENSTAR (US), INC. and DONALD ANDREW BUCK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BUCK v. ENSTAR (US), INC.
as 2:2019cv21125
Defendant:
ENSTAR (US), INC.
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANDREW BUCK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BUCK v. Enstar (US), Inc.
as 2:2019cv21120
Defendant:
Enstar (US), Inc.
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANDREW BUCK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ANDREWS v. SEREN IPS, INC.
as 1:2018cv13194
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANDREWS
Defendant:
SEREN IPS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BOYARSKY, M.D. v. ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL et al
as 3:2017cv05743
Defendant:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL , RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY , ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BOYARSKY, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RICE v. GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00879
Plaintiff:
ANDREW RICE
Defendant:
GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and GENERAL ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
