Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Davis et al v. Nines et al
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Brian Andrew Davis and Joan Ann Davis
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Nines, Assistant Warden Ronald Weber, Cheif of Security Bradley Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Maryland State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Rodney Andrew McNeil
Defendant:
Maryland State Police, Det. Becker, S/Tpr Whorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv03023
Petitioner:
David C. Andrews
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dicks v. Yes Care Medical Company et al
as 1:2023cv02464
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Dicks, Sr.
Defendant:
Yes Care Medical Company, Corizon Medical Company, Vincent O. Nwusor, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01541
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parmlee v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Andrew Parmlee
Defendant:
State of Maryland, John Howard and Nevin Nolte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dicks v. Weber
as 1:2022cv01408
Petitioner:
Andrew Joseph Dicks
Respondent:
Ronald Shane Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01254
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Taylor
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lloyd
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Director Gail Watts
as 1:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Mr. Andrew Lloyd
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts and Officer Ms. Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
