Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21449
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL PETERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angel Peterson v. Anthony Steward, et al
as 20-1421
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, RASHEED ANSARI, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL PETERSON
Angel PetersonIn re: Angel Peterson
as 20-1023
Respondent:
SHAWN BREWER
Petitioner:
In re: ANGEL PETERSON
Angel Peterson v. Shawn Brewer
as 19-2245
Respondent / Appellee:
SHAWN BREWER
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL PETERSON
Peterson v. Steward et al
as 2:2017cv11733
Plaintiff:
Angel Peterson
Defendant:
Anthony Steward , Office of Community Corrections , Aramark Correction Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Angel Peterson v. Rocky Burris, et al
as 17-1291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCKY BURRIS, MSI Supervisor, MICHIGAN STATE INDUSTRIES and MILLICENT WARREN, Warden
Saldana et al v. Perego et al
as 4:2015cv00227
Petitioner:
Marco Saldana, Timmy J. Thulmie, Lisa M. Tullis and others
Respondent:
Zoe Perego, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Edward Snowden and others
Defendant:
Lt. Keith Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shaq et al v. Kobe et al
as 4:2015cv10630
Petitioner:
Michelle Shaq, Jimmy Theola, Georgette Thornton and others
Respondent:
James Kobe, Michigan Department of Corrections and Michigan, State of
Magic et al v. Bird et al
as 4:2015cv00386
Petitioner:
Edward B Magic, Jimmy J Theolia, Georgette Thornton and others
Respondent:
Christopher Bird, TDCJ, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peterson v. Burris et al
as 1:2014cv13000
Plaintiff:
Angel Peterson
Defendant:
Rocky Burris, Michigan State Industries and Millicent Warren
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
