Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR and DULCE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS LADA and DOES, 1-10
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR and DULCE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS LADA and DOES, 1-10
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR, DULCE SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Mohammad Nassiri, et al v. Nancy Berryhill, et al
as 18-55304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, ANH T. THAI, DIEP THI NGUYEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commisisoner of Social Security, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARY HAGAR, Supervisor and others
Truyen Phan, et al v. Carolyn Colvin
as 14-55514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRUYEN GIA PHAN, MINH TRIEU DOAN, CUC HUYNH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security
Phan et al v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv02036
Plaintiff:
Truyen Gia Phan , Minh Trieu Doan , Lilyan Loc Le and others
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.