Cases 1 - 10 of 19
In re: Kenth Rogers
as 21-1134
Petitioner:
In re: KENTH W. ROGERS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR VIRGIN ISLANDS BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ANNE E. THOMPSON and GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
Lynn Smith v. Andrea Dobin, et al
as 20-1614
Defendant / Appellee:
ELI HALTOVSKY, HONORABLE ANNE E. THOMPSON, HONORABLE MICHAEL B. KAPLAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN Z. SMITH
Defendant:
FIVE STAR SERVICES LLC
Cary PetersonIn re: Cary Peterson
as 20-1585
Respondent:
SEC, MADELINE C. ARLEO, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DAY and others
Petitioner:
In re: CARY LEE PETERSON
In re: C. Tate George
as 20-1011
Not Yet Classified:
ANNE E. THOMPSON, In re: C. TATE GEORGE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
William Saunders, Jr. v. , et alIn re: William Saunders, Jr. v. , et al
as 19-3702
Defendant:
PRINCETON HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISION, COUNCIL MEMBERS, Individually and In Official Capacity, ARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON and others
Not Yet Classified:
In re: WILLIAM HARDY SAUNDERS, JR., Artist and Photographer, Member of Class Represent Minority Group; As Individual; and On behalf Class All Other Persons Similarly Situated John and Mary Does One Through Hundred Yet to Be Identified and Determine P and ANNE E. THOMPSON
Cary PetersonIn re: Cary Peterson
as 19-3632
Not Yet Classified:
In re: CARY LEE PETERSON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEONARD P. STARK and others
In re: C. Tate George
as 19-1712
Not Yet Classified:
In re: C. TATE GEORGE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANNE E. THOMPSON
In re: Francisco Herrera-Genao
as 19-1429
Undetermined:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, In re: FRANCISCO HERRERA-GENAO and ANNE E. THOMPSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1211
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nominal Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
