Cases 1 - 10 of 386
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farr v. St. Louis County Justice Center et al
as 4:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Anthony Farr
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Center, Attorney Patrick Scott Kilgore, Judge Kristine A. Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majors v. Trout et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dillonger John Majors
Defendant:
Richard Trout, Sophie Machen, Unknown Reavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Williams
as 6:2023cv03318
Petitioner:
Anthony DeJuan Chavez
Respondent:
E Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGee v. Adams
as 4:2023cv01145
Petitioner:
Anthony McGee
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Clemons-Abdullah et al
as 4:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Darnel Spear, Tammy Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2023cv01006
Petitioner:
Anthony Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chavez v. Dourgthy et al
as 6:2023cv03224
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeJuan Chavez
Defendant:
Chris Dourgthy and Sarah Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Myers v. USA
as 4:2023cv00481
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Myers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
