Cases 41 - 50 of 352
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Baskerville v. Experian
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Anthony Baskerville
Defendant:
Experian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clinch v. Chambers et al
as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clinch
Defendant:
Pamela Chambers, Stephanie Oliver and Glynn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stepherson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brown et al v. blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Anderson Brown and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
antony john blinken doing business as ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN secretary of state, et al. United States, janet louise yellen doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States, merrick garland doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv02745
Defendant:
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
