Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Lewis v. Vail et al
as 2:2010cv05089
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Jeff Uttecht, David Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Uttech
as 2:2010cv01033
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Respondent:
Jeff Uttech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Uttech
as 2:2010cv00197
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Respondent:
Jeff Uttech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony Lewis v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 10-35427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EUGENE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, Secretary of Department of Corrections, SCOTT FRAKES, Superintendent of Monroe Correction Center Special Offender Unit, PAULA BRIGGS, Custody Unit Supervisor of C-Unit Special Offender Mental Health Unit and others
Anthony Lewis v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 10-35398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EUGENE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, Secretary of Department of Correction, JEFF UTTECHT, Superintendent of Coyote Ridge Correction Center, QUIGGLE, Dr. and others
Anthony Lewis v. King County
as 10-35393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EUGENE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY, A Municipal Corporation
Anthony Lewis v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 10-35394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EUGENE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, Secretary of Department of Correction, JEFF UTTECHT, Superintendent of Coyote Ridge Correction Center, LYONS, Medical Supervisor and others
Lewis v. Vail et al
as 2:2010cv05042
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Jeff Uttecht, Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Vail et al
as 2:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Walter, Scott Frakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Lewis v. King County
as 10-35241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EUGENE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY, A Municipal Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
