Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Fletcher v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
Sheriff Jarrod Peters, Officer Ryan Coffee, Officer Jason Juenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fletcher v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Terre Haute U.S.P., Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Terre Haute U.S.P., . Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fletcher v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. USA et al
as 1:2020cv02221
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Coleman
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fletcher v. Thompson
as 1:2019cv01233
Petitioner:
Anthony L Fletcher
Interested Party:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Scott Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
