Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 464
Ewing v. DME Capital, LLC
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Defendant: DME Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Anton Saadeh v. Solibus Payments, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00745
Plaintiff: Anton Saadeh
Defendant: Solibus Payments, Inc., Erek Newton, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ewing v. Murphy et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Defendant: John Anthony Murphy and Polaris Rental Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Lindahl v. Thatcher We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv05160
Petitioner: Peter Anton Lindahl
Respondent: Thatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores-Amaut, et al. v. Garland
as 24-839
Petitioner: RICHARD EMILIO FLORES-AMAUT, ELIZABETH ROA-ANTON, RODRIGO ALONSO FLORES-ROA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Viral DRM, LLC v. Shubstorsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff: Viral DRM, LLC
Defendant: Maryna Lietucheva and Anton Shubstorsky
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Ewing v. Synergy Capital I, LLC
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Defendant: Synergy Capital I, LLC
Ewing v. Rogers, et al.
as 24-466
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTON A. EWING
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES C. ROGERS and CHUCK "BUCK" ROGERS REALITY, INC., a California corporation
Ewing v. Tip Top Capital, Inc
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Defendant: Tip Top Capital, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Ewing v. Qualifi, LLC
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Defendant: Qualifi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?