Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al
as 4:2013mc80026
Plaintiff:
Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:
Apotex Inc., Apotex Corp., Perrigo Israel Pharmaceutical Ltd. and others
Miscellaneou:
Impax Laboratories, Inc.,
Ferring B.V. v. Apotex, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01941
Defendant:
Apotex Corp. and Apotex, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ferring B.V.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Bryant v. Apotex Inc et al
as 1:2012at00553
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Bryant
Defendant:
Apotex Inc , American Health Packaging , Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Apotex Inc et al
as 1:2012cv01377
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Bryant
Defendant:
Apotex Inc , American Health Packaging , Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferring B.V. v. Apotex, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00854
Counter Claimant:
Apotex Corp. and Apotex, Inc.
Defendant:
Apotex Corp. and Apotex, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Ferring B.V.
Plaintiff:
Ferring B.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ferring B.V. v. Apotex, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00485
Defendant:
Apotex Corp. and Apotex, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ferring B.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Genentech, Inc. et al v. Apotex, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02410
Plaintiff:
Genentech, Inc. and Roche Palo Alto LLC
Defendant:
Apotex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Genentech, Inc. et al v. Apotex, Inc.
as 4:2011cv02410
Plaintiff:
Genentech, Inc. and Roche Palo Alto LLC
Defendant:
Apotex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Genentech, Inc. et al v. Apotex, Inc.
as 4:2011cv02410
Plaintiff:
Genentech, Inc. and Roche Palo Alto LLC
Defendant:
Apotex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Genentech, Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
as 3:2011cv01925
Plaintiff:
Genentech, Inc. and Roche Palo Alto, LLC
Interested Party:
Apotex Inc.
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.