Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cambridge Industries USA Inc. v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
as 26-2219
Appellant:
CAMBRIDGE INDUSTRIES USA INC.
Appellee:
APPLIED OPTOELECTRONICS, INC.
In re: Cambridge Industries USA Inc.
as 26-101
Petitioner:
In re: CAMBRIDGE INDUSTRIES USA INC. and JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Respondent:
APPLIED OPTOELECTRONICS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENTERPRISE, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION and others
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. v. Accelight Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2024cv09041
Defendant:
Accelight Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. v. Eoptolink Technology USA Inc.
as 5:2024cv08165
Plaintiff:
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Defendant:
Eoptolink Technology USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. v. Cambridge Industries USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Defendant:
Cambridge Industries USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. v. Molex, LLC
as 4:2023cv04787
Plaintiff:
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Defendant:
Molex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rougier et al v. Applied Optoelectronics Inc
as 4:2019cv04721
Plaintiff:
Kenneth X. Luthy, John Kugel, Roy H. Cetlin and others
Defendant:
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
In Re:
Amazon.com Inc
Ng et al v. Lin et al
as 4:2018cv04751
Defendant:
Alex Ignatiev, Richard B Black, Stefan J. Murry and others
Plaintiff:
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. and Yiu Kwong Ng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGrath v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03914
Defendant:
Chih-Hsiang Lin, Stefan J. Murry and Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen McGrath
Petitioner:
Ronaldo Borgogni, David Pokoik, Rigo Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pokoik v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03722
Defendant:
Chih-Hsiang Lin, Stefan J. Murry and Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Davin Pokoik
Petitioner:
Ronaldo Borgogni, Rigo Caudill, Stanley Nugit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
