Cases 1 - 10 of 11
EVANS v. BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
REBECCA EVANS
Defendant:
BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPARELL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC v. STRATMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00154
Plaintiff:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER STRATMAN and SITEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olinger et al v. Menard Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00288
Defendant:
Menard Inc. and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gary Olinger and Gail Olinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WRIGHT v. ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
as 2:2019cv00503
Plaintiff:
SHANNON L. WRIGHT
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gooch v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 4:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jane H Gooch
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COCHRAN v. ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
as 4:2017cv00093
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
Plaintiff:
RANDY COCHRAN
Intervenor:
KENTUCKY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
PRIMM v. WESTEX, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
ANGELO PRIMM
Defendant:
WESTEX, INC. , MILLIKEN SERVICES, LLC , MILLIKEN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GENNARO et al v. THE KROGER CO. et al
as 1:2012cv01013
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC and THE KROGER CO.
Plaintiff:
BETTY GENNARO and JOSEPH GENNARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
