Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Akers v. Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc., et al
as 1:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
SONYA AKERS as Personal Representative of the Estate of ANTHONY RICARDO JENNINGS a/k/a ANTHONY JENNINGS, deceased, and SONYA AKERS, individually and Sonya Akers
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., d/b/a ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW YORK a, VANTAGE POINT SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a VANTAGE POINT SOLUTIONS OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc., doing business as Armstrong Telecommunications of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CHR SOLUTIONS, INC
as 2:2018cv00787
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CHR SOLUTIONS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AT&T CORP. v. ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 2:2015cv01393
Plaintiff:
AT&T CORP.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MCI Communications Services Inc et al v. Armstrong Telecommunications Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services Inc and Verizon Select Services Inc
Defendant:
Armstrong Telecommunications Inc , Armstrong Telephone Company of Maryland , Armstrong Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 206
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v. ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as PAW/1:14-cv-00240
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services, Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. , ARMSTRONG TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MARYLAND , ARMSTRONG TELEPHONE COMPANY and others
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v. ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. and VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INC.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., ARMSTRONG TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, ARMSTRONG TELEPHONE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
