Cases 1 - 10 of 40
ARNOLD v. USA
as 7:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
JUSTIN CHARLES ARNOLD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BULLOCK v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN TRACY JEFFERSON, DEPUTY WARDEN ARNOLD SPIKES, Deputy Warden MICHAEL THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLOCK v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN TRACY JEFFERSON, DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL THOMAS and DEPUTY WARDEN ARNOLD SPIKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HENDERSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2021cv00088
Defendant:
WADE OWENS, LAUREN PARISH, Judge WADE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTES-ROBINSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Defendant:
DETECTIVE TIMOTHY KYLE ARNOLD and ACWORTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
YAHAAKOB ESTES-ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACREE v. JACKSON et al
as 7:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Deputy Warden TAYLOR, Officer LEWIS, Deputy Warden JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ACREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENRY v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2018cv00165
Defendant:
HARRISS, ARNOLD, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MILTON LEROY HENRY, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. GOSS et al
as 1:2018cv00143
Defendant:
CLERK EVONNE MULL, ATTORNEY CHARLES ARNOLD, JR, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER CARR and others
Plaintiff:
TOREY FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. PHELPS et al
as 5:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
MILTON MITCHELL
Defendant:
PHELPS, ARNOLD and GLEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CENTRAL STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 5:2017cv00301
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Defendant:
CENTRAL STATE HOSPITAL, RIGSBY, CHRISTIAN HILDRETH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
