Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Martinez v. Toombs et al
as 2:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martiinez and Anthony E Martinez
Defendant:
Arnold Toombs, Grace Moran, Willet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Dialysis et al
as 3:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Chardonnay Dialysis, Brittany, Anne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Arnold
as 2:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Johnson
Defendant:
Carl Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Gittere
as 2:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anderson
Defendant:
William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Gittere
as 3:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Arnold Anderson
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cordova Carballo et al v. Barr et al
as 2:2020cv02196
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodolfo Castellanos, Abel De La Cruz, Jose Moises Silva Garcia and others
Defendant:
Pamela Lauer, William Barr, Gabriel C Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crain v. Arnold et al
as 2:2020cv01054
Defendant:
Carl Arnold, Michael Stanfort and Roy Nelson
Plaintiff:
Latroymen Crain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiner v. The State of Nevada et al
as 3:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Bruce Arnold Tiner
Defendant:
Dr. Kim Adamson, James Dzurenda, Rosselle Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Nevada Southern Detention Center
as 2:2018cv02172
Defendant:
Nevada Southern Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Arnold Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00653
Defendant:
Tara Carpentar, Nevada Department of Corrections, Dave Pollard and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Arnold Tiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
