Cases 1 - 8 of 8
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Kugler
as 1:2012mc00354
Movant:
Arthrocare Corporation
Defendant:
Jeffrey Kugler, MD
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Respondent:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
ArthroCare Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv03216
Petitioner:
ArthroCare Corporation and ArthroCare Corporation
Respondent:
Ethicon, Inc., DePuy Mitek, Inc., Gyrus Medical, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
ArthroCare Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv03216
Petitioner:
ArthroCare Corporation and ArthroCare Corporation
Respondent:
Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare, Gynecare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
McIlvaine et al v. Arthrocare Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00863
Plaintiff:
John J. McIlvaine, John J. McIlvaine, John J. McIlvaine and others
Defendant:
Arthrocare Corporation, Arthrocare Corporation, Arthrocare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mcilvaine v. Arthrocare Corporation et al
as 9:2008cv80343
Plaintiff:
John J. Mcilvaine, John J. Mcilvaine, John J. Mcilvaine and others
Defendant:
Arthrocare Corporation, Arthrocare Corporation, Michael Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
ARTHROCARE V SMITH & NEPHEW
as 04-1487
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
ARTHROCARE CORPORATION
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
ETHICON
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
ARTHROCARE V SMITH & NEPHEW
as 04-1352
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant:
ARTHROCARE CORPORATION
ARTHROCARE V SMITH & NEPHEW
as 04-1323
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
ARTHROCARE CORPORATION
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
ETHICON, INC.
ETHICON, INC:
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
