Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SMITH v. PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv13862
Plaintiff:
MARA SMITH
Defendant:
PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. and JERMAINE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERCADO v. ROPER et al
as 2:2016cv03408
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MERCADO
Defendant:
TASHEEM ROPER, COUNTY OF ESSEX , ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PROPOSED SETTLEMENT CLASS SETTLEMENTS TOTAL IN 10.5 MILLION HAVE BEEN REACHED WITH TWO DEFENDANTS IN RE DOMESTIC DRYWALL ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL NO. 2437 AND 13-MD-2437 et al
as 2:2015cv03985
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT CLASS SETTLEMENTS TOTAL IN 10.5 MILLION HAVE BEEN REACHED WITH TWO DEFENDANTS IN RE DOMESTIC DRYWALL ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL NO. 2437 AND 13-MD-2437, WALLBOARD MANUFACTURED, USG CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IUELE v. MCMANIERNY et al
as 2:2014cv07426
Plaintiff:
MASSIMO IUELE
Defendant:
TIM MCMANIERNY, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ONLINE EXPRESS, INC. et al v. CARPEZZI LIEBERT GROUP [GLC] et al
as 2:2013cv01888
Plaintiff:
ONLINE EXPRESS, INC. and OSMAN N. OZSUSAMLAR
Defendant:
CARPEZZI LIEBERT GROUP "[CLG], TRI-STATE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Holt et al
as 3:2012cv00221
Petitioner:
Rufus Deon Wilson
Respondent:
Ronnie R. Holt , Marianne O'Battani and United States of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GOODMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC.
as 2:2007cv05489
Petitioner:
JAMAL GOODMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
