Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Legacy Equity Advisors LLC v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Legacy Equity Advisors LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03734
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gaither et al v. Rocking T Inc of Amarillo, Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Gaither, Diana Cedillo and John Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Rocking T Inc of Amarillo, Texas and Seaboards Foods LLC of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gassaway v. AT&T Inc et al
as 4:2018cv00271
Plaintiff:
Doug Gassaway
Defendant:
AT&T Inc and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
